Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: sd: drop the dead -EOVERFLOW branches

[shao.mingyin]

On 11/5/26 09:20, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Please mention in the patch description which commit removed the
> -EOVERFLOW return statements, e.g. as follows: "Commit 72deb455b5ec
> ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF") removed the last -EOVERFLOW return
> statements from read_capacity_10() and read_capacity_16()."

Agreed, I will use that wording.  I checked 72deb455b5ec in the tree: it
removes the two -EOVERFLOW returns and neither function returns that value
any more.

Thanks,
Shao