Re: [PATCH v1 07/10] kconfig-checker: Introduce overlays schema

[Ahmed S. Darwish]

On Sat, 07 Nov 2026, sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > +# and a custom-overlay.yml:
> > +#
> > +# rules:
> > +#  - name: CONFIG_DRM
> > +#    expected: allow
>
> [Severity: Low]
>
> Should this example use "expected: allowed" instead of "expected: allow"?
>
> base.yml restricts expected to y, n, or allowed, so an overlay written
> from this example fails schema validation.
>

Correct, it should be 'allowed' in that comment above; will fix.

Thanks,
Ahmed