RE: [PATCH 6/7] tpm: Include <asm/cpu_device_id.h> unconditionally

From: Popov, Pavel E

Date: Wed Nov 11 2026 - 20:31:05 EST


> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Are these expected to be picked separately by subsystems?

Yes, each through its own subsystem tree, once [1] is in mainline.
The tpm patch does not build on non-x86 before that.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261111234439.4098-1-pavel.e.popov@xxxxxxxxx

Thanks,
Pavel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2026 5:40 PM
> To: Popov, Pavel E <pavel.e.popov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>; Viresh Kumar
> <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joonas
> Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Alex Deucher
> <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>; Christian König
> <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; Hans de Goede <hansg@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ilpo
> Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Huewe
> <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>; Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>;
> Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky
> <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Logan Gunthorpe
> <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Len Brown
> <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jason
> Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>; David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>; Simona Vetter
> <simona@xxxxxxxx>; David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> x86@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-
> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] tpm: Include <asm/cpu_device_id.h> unconditionally
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 04:48:19PM -0700, Pavel Popov wrote:
> > <asm/cpu_device_id.h> now has a generic version, so the #ifdef
> > CONFIG_X86 around the include is no longer needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Popov <pavel.e.popov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Are these expected to be picked separately by subsystems?
>
> Br, Jarkko