Re: (*(unsigned long *)&jiffies)++;

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2000 - 13:29:11 EST


On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

>what's wrong with using existing atomic_XXX() macros? They are explicitly

The correct code is the current one or jiffies++. If you want to go faster
this time you should hack the compiler (to use incl) and not the kernel :).

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 07 2000 - 21:00:07 EST