Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:

From: Lauri Tischler (lauri.tischler@efore.fi)
Date: Tue Jan 11 2000 - 16:09:00 EST

Next message: Richard A Nelson: "2.3.39 Olympic.c (TR) and multicast errors"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.3.39 doesn't compile on Jensen (axp) w/RH60"
In reply to: John Alvord: "RE: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Reply: James Manning: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Reply: Mark Hahn: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

John Alvord wrote:
>
> Given the recent Y2K scare, getting a label that says your software is
> 2038 compliant should be powerful marketting material in 10-15 years.

BTW. What is the _exact_ datetime when Unix's freak ?

-- lauri.tischler@efore.fi

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard A Nelson: "2.3.39 Olympic.c (TR) and multicast errors"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: 2.3.39 doesn't compile on Jensen (axp) w/RH60"
In reply to: John Alvord: "RE: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Reply: James Manning: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Reply: Mark Hahn: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug Summary:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST