Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@sco.COM)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 07:50:44 EST


On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> OK, I tend to agree with you. Not just because it takes less time to recompile
> the kernel after changing things - but mainly because I think we should try to
> cut down the number of factors which affect the compatibility of modules.

Ok, good. Then I submit for general review (not Linus yet) the final
patch:

   http://www.ocston.org/~tigran/patches/kmod-2.3.40-p1.patch

It is 35K, 44 files changed, 109 insertions, 273 deletions. I thought
Linus likes the idea of removing lines of code so I made sure I remove
as much as possible :)

Regards,
------
Tigran A. Aivazian | http://www.sco.com
Escalations Research Group | tel: +44-(0)1923-813796
Santa Cruz Operation Ltd | http://www.ocston.org/~tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST