Re: [svlug] February 30th 2000

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2000 - 02:16:04 EST


Followup to: <E128UW5-0006dS-00@the-village.bc.nu>
By author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > 2000 is the first century year to be a leap year since 1600.
> > 1700, 1800, 1900 were all 4 years since the last leap year,
> > but they were not leap years because they could not be
> > evenly divided by 400.
>
> Not quite true.
>
> 1700 is a leap year. The current rules used for the leap year skipping post date
> 1700 8). Real the "cal" source one day if you are interested in calendars - its
> fascinating
>
> Alan
>

That is true for the U.K. and former colonies only (1752). Various
countries changed between 1582 (Catholic countries) to 1918 (Russia.)

          -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST