Re: February 30th 2000

From: Theodore Y. Ts'o (tytso@MIT.EDU)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2000 - 10:04:31 EST


   Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:06:00 +1300
   From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>

> Our current (gregorian) rules come to
>
> 365 + 1/4 - 1/100 + 1/400 = 365.2425
>
> The difference with 365.24219878 is: .00030122, which means that every
> 3320 years or so, we're having one too many leap years. So, I would
> suggest that we make the year 3300 a leap year. And 6600, 9900, 13300
> and so on.... (*)

   Years evenly divisible by 4000 are _not_ leap years. I only know of
   one (nay, two shortly) piece of code which take this into account...

There's a good reason for that. The 4000 rule has no official standing.
If you work out the numbers, then the 4000 rule makes sense. This is
why a number of people have suggested it.

However, no government or astronomical authority has officially blessed
the 4000 rule at this point. After all, we do have a few centuries to
figure this one out. :-)

Now, can we *please* get this off the linux-kernel list?

                                                - Ted

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:24 EST