>From: Kelly Alexander <kelly@nvidia.com>
>
> I've read a bunch of linux news that says that the later kernels
>such as 2.3.35 can support more than 1gb of memory. I've put together a
>system with 4gb of RAM (dell 6300, 2x PIII 550 xeon CPUs) and can see that
2.2.14aa1 supports 4g of RAM on IA32 and 2Terabyte of RAM on alpha (wihout
per-process limit on alpha) with production quality. Apply the below patch
against 2.2.14 if you can't run an unstable tree.
ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.2/2.2.14aa1.gz
>processes. However, I've been unable to malloc and use more than 1gb per
>process. Is this a limitation or am I doing something wrong? I've tried to
If you use 2.2.14aa1 you can apply these two incremental patches (they
should go on the top of 2.3.x as well) to allocate more ram per-process
(something like 3.5G). The two incremental patches are _not_ a good idea
if you need a large I/O cache (like for webservers). For scientific
application that only needs lots of RAM they should be fine.
ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.14/bigmem-large-mapping-1.gz
ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.14/patches/v2.2/2.2.14/bigmem-large-task-1.gz
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST