Re: re-use of SunOS system call numbers for 32-bit UID syscalls

• Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Broken Initial RAM Disk support"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing"
• In reply to: Chuck Lever: "re-use of SunOS system call numbers for 32-bit UID syscalls"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: re-use of SunOS system call numbers for 32-bit UID syscalls"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> i'm not sure this is a good idea (from include/asm-sparc/unistd.h):
>
> #define __NR_setregid32 75 /* Linux sparc32, madvise under SunOS
> */
> #define __NR_vhangup 76 /* Common
> */
> #define __NR_truncate64 77 /* Linux sparc32 Specific
> */
> #define __NR_getgroups32 78 /* Linux sparc32, mincore under SunOS
> */
>
> can i have these back please? :)

No, but it does not matter much actually. SunOS has completely different
syscall table.

Cheers,
    Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | jakub@redhat.com | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/~jj
Linux version 2.3.39 on a sparc64 machine (1343.49 BogoMips)
___________________________________________________________________

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Broken Initial RAM Disk support"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing"
• In reply to: Chuck Lever: "re-use of SunOS system call numbers for 32-bit UID syscalls"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: re-use of SunOS system call numbers for 32-bit UID syscalls"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST