Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?

From: Taso Hatzi (taso@esands.com)
Date: Mon Jan 17 2000 - 19:13:07 EST

Next message: kutek@cybercomm.net: "are limits bogus?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux crypto patch for 2.3 kernels"
In reply to: Gerard Roudier: "Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Next in thread: Tuukka Toivonen: "Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Reply: Tuukka Toivonen: "Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Gerard Roudier wrote:

> Booted in less than half a second.

Now that would be really impressive if Linux/x86 could do it.
I wonder why x86 BIOSes take so long to get going?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: kutek@cybercomm.net: "are limits bogus?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux crypto patch for 2.3 kernels"
In reply to: Gerard Roudier: "Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Next in thread: Tuukka Toivonen: "Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Reply: Tuukka Toivonen: "Re: [OT] PDP-8 - was: Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:16 EST