Re: Why wrapping PIDs is evil [was 32bit]

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 17 2000 - 19:35:07 EST

Next message: Jeff Dike: "user-mode port 0.5-2.3.36"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: [Semi-OT,important] ORBS globally blocks users of these lists"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: Why wrapping PIDs is evil [was 32bit]"
Reply: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Why wrapping PIDs is evil [was 32bit]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I forgot to mention: of course _pavel_ is evil and created/killed just
> enough processes for PIDs to wrap in bad way.

Thats ok, with a 32bit pid_t he'll be a few days getting around to that

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Dike: "user-mode port 0.5-2.3.36"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: [Semi-OT,important] ORBS globally blocks users of these lists"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: Why wrapping PIDs is evil [was 32bit]"
Reply: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Why wrapping PIDs is evil [was 32bit]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:16 EST