Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?

From: Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 13:26:43 EST

Next message: James Fidell: "IRQ clash problems with 2.2.14 and 2.3.33?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] nfds limit for poll() raised to 131 million (is that enough?)"
In reply to: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch wrote:
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > Yes, yes! It's worth it!
>
> I have to admit that I find the idea rather tempting too. On the other
> hand, is there anything this would do that an automounter wouldn't ?

Yes, it allows read access at all times.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Fidell: "IRQ clash problems with 2.2.14 and 2.3.33?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] nfds limit for poll() raised to 131 million (is that enough?)"
In reply to: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:22 EST