Re: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 12:30:42 EST

Next message: James A Simmons: "Re: Pentium Pro MTRR & Graphics Card"
Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "[Patch] shm fs against 2.3.40"
In reply to: Matt: "Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Next in thread: Matt: "Re: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Reply: Matt: "Re: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Reply: Lourdes Jones: "RE: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> This bug seems to exploit a flaw in the tcp-ip protocol.

yeah right. I've seen nothing with any information of use. No cert internal
notifications just hoohah.

I've no idea what the stream thing is, and until it gets documented nothing
is going to happen

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James A Simmons: "Re: Pentium Pro MTRR & Graphics Card"
Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "[Patch] shm fs against 2.3.40"
In reply to: Matt: "Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Next in thread: Matt: "Re: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Reply: Matt: "Re: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Reply: Lourdes Jones: "RE: Serious potential TCP-IP FLAW(was Re: kernel panics at google)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST