Fuzzy Fox writes:
> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> > I've lost count of the times I've watched my box fsck huge partitions
> > that it hadn't even touched before the crash - not even for an atime
> > update.
>
> In such a case (filesystems that it would be nice to have available, but
> rarely get touched or examined), you may with to consider an autofs
> solution.
This is what ext2 will fix instantly. If there are no outstanding journal
transactions for a filesystem (i.e. quiescent filesystem), fsck time is
basically zero for a filesystem no matter how big it is. No point in
hacking something new in at this time for a problem that has already been
solved, IMHO.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST