Also sprach Matthew Wilcox:
} Why do we have printk anyway? It serves the same purpose as printf and
} is even tagged as `taking arguments like printf' for gcc's type-checking
} benefit. It makes it harder to take large chunks of code and move it
} to userspace for testing (ok, i can #define printk printf, but still).
} Just Hysterical Raisins?
}
Are you suggesting using printf instead? Surely you jest. libc is not
compiled into the kernel, of course.
Cheers.
-- || Bill Wendling wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST