Re: Release date

From: Rik van Riel (riel@nl.linux.org)
Date: Sun Jan 23 2000 - 08:45:29 EST

Next message: Piete Brooks: "Newbie question on iso9660: files partially AWOL ?"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
In reply to: William Scott Lockwood III: "Release date"
Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Release date"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, William Scott Lockwood III wrote:

> Is it true that the release date for 2.4.0 has been set in stone?

2.4.0 will be released when it is ready. If somebody mails a
critical bug report to Linus two hours before 2.4.0 would be
released, you can bet that it'll be released later.

> Can we know what that date is?

Not unless you can see into the future. Oh, if you see the
date, would you care to tell us? I'm sure Linus would love
to know...

Rik

-- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Piete Brooks: "Newbie question on iso9660: files partially AWOL ?"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
In reply to: William Scott Lockwood III: "Release date"
Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Release date"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST