Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :((

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2000 - 18:14:44 EST

Next message: Dimitris Michailidis: "Re: [patch] latest 'guaranteed low latency' patch against 2.2.14"
Previous message: Karen Shaeffer: "Standards of Conduct"
In reply to: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Next in thread: Jim Nance: "Why is ReGet breaking things?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> >> kernel package. Having your patches applied, some of them do.
>
> > 2.2.12->14 build for all combinations I am aware of. Both 'all' and random
> > testing runs.
>
> Hmm. AFAIK "official" 2.2.12->14 kernels are just renamed ac kernels. Am I
> wrong ?

There is stuff in the ac kernels I still occasionally do that isnt in the main
tree - so not quite no

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dimitris Michailidis: "Re: [patch] latest 'guaranteed low latency' patch against 2.2.14"
Previous message: Karen Shaeffer: "Standards of Conduct"
In reply to: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Next in thread: Jim Nance: "Why is ReGet breaking things?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST