On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> [0] My thinking is somewhat slow today, but as I recall the
> fs caps implementation wants to include all three sets,
> yes?
>
> In the later POSIX drafts, I believe the fs capability sets have been
> dropped down to two, "allowed" and "forced".
That makes a lot of sense from a comprehensibility standpoint :-)
If process has CAP_FOO-p, will it get EPERM (EACCESS?) if it tries
to exec() a binary with that capability "forced"?
Matthew.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST