Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but...

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2000 - 13:50:33 EST

Next message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.3.43: won't boot on one computer"
In reply to: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Next in thread: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Reply: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, William Montgomery wrote:

>is a new function "mark_buffer_protected" in include/linux/fs.h. I think

You don't need to change it.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.3.43: won't boot on one computer"
In reply to: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Next in thread: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Reply: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST