In message <200002132112.NAA09873@work.bitmover.com>, Larry McVoy writes:
+-----
| : I wasn't so much interested in that level as the one where SCSI is itself a
| : networking protocol. Current SCSI drives are effectively IDE drives with
|
> ( ... )
|
| Am I missing knowledge of some advance in SCSI?
+--->8
Again, I'm not talking about protocols. I'm addressing the argument that an
STP-capable drive is somehow fundamentally different from a SCSI-capable
one, since that's the argument that keeps being raised against this idea.
I'm talking about the controller board, not the details of communication.
--
brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh
We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST