Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :((

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 20:09:23 EST

Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch> said:
> >>>>> "Sergey" == Sergey Kubushin <ksi@ksi-linux.com> writes:
> Sergey> On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> > that it'd probably compile with kgcc-2.7.2.3 (although breaking
> >> in some > other part), but it's to illustrate that NO vanilla
> >> 2.2.xx kernel is > compileable outta the box...

> >> I don't care if it doesnt build with gcc 2.95. I keep telling
> >> people this. It seems to work with 2.95 now except for a few odd
> >> driver bits.

> Sergey> Please, do return to the ground. kgcc-2.7.2.3 is dead long
> Sergey> ago. As well as libc-4.something...

> gcc-2.7.2.3 is *the* recommended compiler for 2.2.x!

Maybe. But I bet most are compiled either by an egcs release (Red Hat does
this) or 2.95.2 nowadays. Several by other variants, like pgcc (Mandrake). 

-- 
Horst von Brand                             vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Viņa del Mar, Chile                               +56 32 672616

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:28 EST