Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 11:58:13 EST

Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: 1024 byte sector file system problem."
Previous message: Marcus Sundberg: "Re: How to survive in a Micro$oft environment??"
In reply to: david parsons: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Next in thread: Bill Wendling: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Reply: Bill Wendling: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Reply: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, david parsons wrote:

> ____
> david parsons \bi/ and Hours! Hours I tell you! of re-indenting code.
> \/

Or 5 seconds in Emacs. Granted 4 of those are for loading..

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: 1024 byte sector file system problem."
Previous message: Marcus Sundberg: "Re: How to survive in a Micro$oft environment??"
In reply to: david parsons: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Next in thread: Bill Wendling: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Reply: Bill Wendling: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Reply: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:20 EST