Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 17:40:24 EST

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Capabilities"
Previous message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
In reply to: Michael Meissner: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Next in thread: Michael Meissner: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Reply: Michael Meissner: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Meissner wrote:
> long since dead, it is kind of hard to change for 32-bit land (obviously 64 bit
> land will have an different ABI).

That is the crux of the matter.... In the PPC arch, size_t is
unconditionally the same whether you have a 32-bit or 64-bit procesor...

-- Jeff Garzik | "Are you the police?" Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft, Inc. | "No ma'am. We're musicians."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Capabilities"
Previous message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] fancy new memory detection, for pre-patch-2.3.48-2"
In reply to: Michael Meissner: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Next in thread: Michael Meissner: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Reply: Michael Meissner: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:21 EST