Re: APM_power_off

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 15:02:12 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux's future: //posix/ipc, //root and so on ?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux's future: //posix/ipc, //root and so on ?"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: APM_power_off"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: APM_power_off"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: APM_power_off"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com said:
>
> ACPI enabled in BIOS.
> Disable it, but leave CONFIG_ACPI enabled... It looks like Abit's
> ACPI tables suck.

Will try that as soon as I can.

jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com said:
>
> I've now disabled ACPI in Linux because it screws up interrupt
> handling, but

> Can you elaborate?

USB never receives interrupts if CONFIG_ACPI is enabled, and I occasionally
see the hde:lost interrupt messages which others were reporting.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux's future: //posix/ipc, //root and so on ?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux's future: //posix/ipc, //root and so on ?"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: APM_power_off"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: APM_power_off"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: APM_power_off"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:23 EST