Re: IOAPIC and 8254

From: Maciej W. Rozycki (macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 09:15:35 EST


On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> I theory, it should be pretty safe to change the default value of HZ
> except many userspace programs probably 100 as an assumption and may
> give funny results.

 This is exactly what I meant. As long as HZ is a macro there is not much
to do about it.

> People do increase HZ to much higher values (10000?) to be better
> control over some kernel features such as CBQ.

 As long as the CPU can handle that many timer interrupts per second
that's OK. But you have to recompile all parts of userland that depend on
HZ.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST