On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>> From: "Mark Hahn" <hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
>> > it's just a content-addressable filestore. nothing new, and definitely
>> > unrelated to symlinks. the point is to uniquify files, almost certainly
>>
>> Anyone want to impart clue? I'm under the impression that symlinks
>> and shortcuts are the same thing; hardlinks and shortcuts are
>> different.
>
>Shortcuts are not symlinks, so much as that they *contain* symlinks. A
>shortcut is a blob of shell metadata that tells Explorer how to run the
>thing it points at, as well as where to find it. The closest analogue in
>Unix would be a wrapper shellscript that sets up the environment and runs
>an app. with switches supplied.
... or a KDE ".kdelnk" style shortcut, or the equiv in GNOME.
-- Mike A. Harris Linux advocate Computer Consultant GNU advocate Capslock Consulting Open Source advocateSuspicious Anagram #4: Word: PRESIDENT CLINTON OF THE USA Anagram: TO COPULATE HE FINDS INTERNS
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST