chip@valinux.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>I'm no expert on life-critical systems, but I've been told that it's
>common for such projects forbid the use of interrupts and dynamic
>memory allocation, so as to increase the system's predictability (at
>the expense of flexibility). If that's true, then Linux will probably
>never end up in charge of airliner control surfaces.
At least on trains they use Windows 3.1 (!) and soon "Embedded NT" for
the status displays for the train driver. I know from one of the guys
who (must) write software for it. They shot down Linux because the
company (for the germans: In Erlangen, you may guess now which
one... ;-) ) is committed to MS-OS.
Hint: Don't step on board of the new german high speed trains...
Regards
Henning
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- hps@tanstaafl.de TANSTAAFL! Consulting - Unix, Internet, SecurityHutweide 15 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 "There ain't no such D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 thing as a free Linux"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST