Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
> Paul Vojta wrote:
> > > you
> > > should test CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL before even presenting an experimental
> > > option to the user.
> >
> > Fair enough. However, since CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HIGH_BANDWIDTH in 2.3.48
> > and CONFIG_DM9102 in 2.2.14 do not follow this convention, I hope you
> > can understand why I might make such a mistake.
>
> E-mail me a patch for this?
OK. Here's for 2.2.14:
-----------------------
--- linux-2.2/drivers/net/Config.in Tue Jan 4 10:12:17 2000
+++ linux-2.2/drivers/net/Config.in.new Sun Mar 5 15:43:40 2000
@@ -128,7 +128,9 @@
fi
tristate 'Apricot Xen-II on board Ethernet' CONFIG_APRICOT
tristate 'CS89x0 support' CONFIG_CS89x0
- tristate 'DM9102 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_DM9102
+ if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
+ tristate 'DM9102 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_DM9102
+ fi
tristate 'Generic DECchip & DIGITAL EtherWORKS PCI/EISA' CONFIG_DE4X5
tristate 'DECchip Tulip (dc21x4x) PCI support' CONFIG_DEC_ELCP
if [ "$CONFIG_DEC_ELCP" != "y" ]; then
-----------------------
And here's for 2.3.49:
-----------------------
--- linux/drivers/usb/Config.in Sun Mar 5 15:30:40 2000
+++ linux/drivers/usb/Config.in.new Sun Mar 5 15:51:11 2000
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
comment 'USB Controllers'
dep_tristate ' UHCI (Intel PIIX4, VIA, ...) support' CONFIG_USB_UHCI $CONFIG_USB
- if [ "$CONFIG_USB_UHCI" != "n" ]; then
+ if [ "$CONFIG_USB_UHCI" != "n" -a "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
bool ' USB-UHCI High Bandwidth (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HIGH_BANDWIDTH
fi
dep_tristate ' UHCI Alternate Driver (JE) support' CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT $CONFIG_USB
-----------------------
--Paul Vojta, vojta@math.berkeley.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST