RE: [OT] fpu IRQ x86-ism

From: nathan.zook@amd.com
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 16:49:59 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: hpa@transmeta.com [mailto:hpa@transmeta.com]
> By author: "B. James Phillippe" <bryan@terran.org>
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Sorry for this somewhat OT question - I'll try to be brief.
> I have always
> > noticed that on x86 Linux boxes, IRQ 13 is for the FPU and
> is always "1" (I
> > assume this is from probing or testing at bootup). This
> value never seems
> > to change, so again I will assume that it is only used to signal FPU
> > errors. There is no "fpu IRQ" on my Alpha, obviously it
> has an FPU as
> > well. Is it's existance on the PC just some lame legacy issue?
> >
>
> Yup. It isn't even used to signal FPU errors on 486+ PCs.
>
> -hpa

It is in comaptibility mode. Which means we have to support it.

Nathan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST