Hi!
> > Here is a patch to avoid multiple same entries in /proc/irq/ and shows
> > only the active interrupts. Although I'm not sure about the test
> > against no_irq_type, Ingo, do you want to show all possible interrupts
> > in /proc/irq/? Then the patch would be a bit smaller and only the
> > register_irq_proc() needs to removed from request_irq() (and one test
> > against no_irq_type is sufficient).
>
> i believe we want to show all possible interrupts. (not all IRQ vectors,
> but all IRQs which are registered by an IRQ controller) The possibility to
> set IRQ affinity should not depend on wether a particular module is loaded
> or not.
...and btw it is nice to see if some activity happened on some
"unused" irq line: (If you are changing this, making it output unused
but active interrupts might be nice, too...)
pavel@bug:~$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 2943640 XT-PIC timer
1: 56843 XT-PIC keyboard
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
4: 5 XT-PIC
5: 4 XT-PIC pcnet_cs
6: 3 XT-PIC
7: 4 XT-PIC
10: 3 XT-PIC
11: 3149983 XT-PIC usb-uhci, ESS Maestro 2E
12: 170 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
13: 1 XT-PIC fpu
14: 10766 XT-PIC ide0
15: 5 XT-PIC ide1
NMI: 0
ERR: 0
-- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents me at discuss@linmodems.org- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST