Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Sat Mar 18 2000 - 15:54:38 EST

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
Previous message: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: Call for evaluation: new Intel eepro/100+, eepro100/S open source driver (but not GPL). Is it stable, neat, or on it's way into"
In reply to: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> One of Alans jobs for 2.4 is merging the 2.2.X fixes and drivers !

I've been doing this for the PCI net drivers, too...

-- Jeff Garzik | My to-do list is a function Building 1024 | which approaches infinity. MandrakeSoft, Inc. |

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
Previous message: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: Call for evaluation: new Intel eepro/100+, eepro100/S open source driver (but not GPL). Is it stable, neat, or on it's way into"
In reply to: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST