Re: iproute and 2.3 question

From: Thomas Davis (tadavis@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Mar 30 2000 - 13:14:29 EST

Next message: Lawrence Manning: "2.3.99pre bonnie oops"
Previous message: Juanjo Ciarlante: "Re: Security Problems with Linux 2.2.x IP Masquerading (fwd)"
In reply to: Jarno Lahteenmaki: "Re: iproute and 2.3 question"
Next in thread: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: iproute and 2.3 question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jarno Lahteenmaki wrote:
>
> Does eql, teql or bonding devices have any failover capabilities?
>

Bonding can do that, if the driver signals that it has lost carrier.
(it's part of the etherchannel spec)

-- ------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Thomas Davis | PDSF Project Leader tadavis@lbl.gov | (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Lawrence Manning: "2.3.99pre bonnie oops"
Previous message: Juanjo Ciarlante: "Re: Security Problems with Linux 2.2.x IP Masquerading (fwd)"
In reply to: Jarno Lahteenmaki: "Re: iproute and 2.3 question"
Next in thread: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: iproute and 2.3 question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST