>> and expensive 56k or 64k lines. I can download reiserfs, ext3, jfs and linlogfs either as patch or
>> as tarball of the new files, why can't you do this, too?
>
>Please do :(
Russell placed a smaller source patch in:
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ftpdir/03312000linux-2.3.99pre2-linux-2.3-xfs.patch.gz
>
>> > Integration with Volume Managers
>>
>> We have a lvm in linux. It's simply a block device for the fs, seems very
>> easy ;)
>
>Fro what I could tell of the XFS code its doesn't use any parts of linux
>VFS layer. It looks like to will have to be slowly intergrated to it.
What to you mean by this?
We have implemented all of the file and inode ops in
xfs/linux/xfs_file.c, xfsZ_iops.c, xfs_super.c, ...
Are you saying that we should eliminate the linvfs layer
and just change the xfs_* routines? If we do eliminate
the linvfs layer we will need to somehow retain the
bhv_desc_t structures so that CXFS can fold in.
>
>"Look it's a text editor, no it's a OS, no it's Emacs"
>James Simmons ____/|
>fbdev/gfx developer \ o.O|
>http://www.linux-fbdev.org =(_)=
>http://linuxgfx.sourceforge.net U
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:07 EST