Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?

From: Paul Barton-Davis (pbd@Op.Net)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 11:49:14 EST

Next message: Tim Waugh: "[patch] 2.3.99-pre4-3: af_decnet decnet_setup fix"
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "[patch] 2.3.99-pre4-3 patch for sym53c8xx_comm.h"
In reply to: Michael Bacarella: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>I grok "Average msecs per MB 7.417227; Average copy rate: 0.000007
>msecs/bytes if run with root permission." as meaning "If I run with root
>permissions, I get 7.4xx MB/sec"

The wording is: "Average msecs per MB", not "Average MB per msec".

--p

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Waugh: "[patch] 2.3.99-pre4-3: af_decnet decnet_setup fix"
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "[patch] 2.3.99-pre4-3 patch for sym53c8xx_comm.h"
In reply to: Michael Bacarella: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST