Re: Is Linux 2.2+ proxy ARP broken?

From: Ion Badulescu (ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu)
Date: Thu Apr 06 2000 - 17:29:44 EST


On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:

> > It's not supported
> I very much doubt this for several reasons. Consider also this (on RH 6.1+2.2.14):
>
> iapetus ~# arp -a
> iapetus ~# ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:21:99:04
> inet addr:192.168.0.39 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
>
> iapetus ~# arp -s 192.168.0.111 11:22:33:44:55:66
> iapetus ~# cat /proc/net/arp
> IP address HW type Flags HW address Mask Device
> 192.168.0.111 0x1 0x6 11:22:33:44:55:66 * eth0
> iapetus ~# arp -a
> ? (192.168.0.111) at 11:22:33:44:55:66 [ether] PERM on eth0

Try making it a PUBLISHED entry.

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST