new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually.

From: Benjamin Redelings I (bredelin@ucla.edu)
Date: Thu Apr 06 2000 - 11:43:30 EST

Next message: Markus Stenberg: "Re: Is Linux 2.2+ proxy ARP broken?"
Previous message: Graham Stoney: "What's the deal with building intermediate .o vs .a files?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: c011ca31
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Oops: 0000
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: CPU: 0
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: EIP:
0010:[access_process_vm+117/360]
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: eax: 00000038 ebx: 0000001c ecx:
bffff000 edx: c2bd0000
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: esi: 00000000 edi: bffffe86 ebp:
00000022 esp: c2965f40
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Process cat (pid: 2013,
stackpage=c2965000)
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Stack: c2bd0000 c2bd0000 c2bd03dc
c2a2b000 00000000 c014e977 c2bd0000 bffffe86
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: c2a2b000 00000022 00000000
c2bd03f8 c014edbe c2bd0000 c2a2b000 c31810c0
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: ffffffea 00000000 c31810c0
c2bd03dc 0804c000 c37d3b60 00000c00 c012c24c
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Call Trace: [proc_pid_cmdline+55/60]
[proc_info_read+378/768] [sys_read+192/224] [system_call+52/56]
Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Code: 39 43 1c 74 2a 50 8b 43 1c 50 68
00 a8 1b c0 e8 37 89 ff ff

UP PPro, glibc2.1.3, devfs, IDE

-- "I want to be in the light, as He is in the Light, I want to shine like the stars in the heavens." - DC Talk, "In the Light" Benjamin Redelings I <>< http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~bredelin/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Markus Stenberg: "Re: Is Linux 2.2+ proxy ARP broken?"
Previous message: Graham Stoney: "What's the deal with building intermediate .o vs .a files?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST