On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:
>Does anyone have any objections to me removing the bits in
>Documentation/Changes that talk about tunelp's trustirq option, seeing as
>it's been removed?
None objection because the TRUST_IRQ wasn't mathematically safe (however
that was also stated in the documentation). At the time I developed
TRUST_IRQ I didn't known the 8259 has a broken feature that cause it to
raise the irq 7 when an irq gone away from under it :(. OTOH in real life
conditions TRUST_IRQ was working fine here :).
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST