arjan@fenrus.demon.nl (Arjan van de Ven) writes:
> In article <050401bfa0a6$59c0dc10$c53518d4@intra.virus.ru> you wrote:
> >>
> >> > So this is no network load problem or server load problem. Still Some of
> >> > connect takes such long as 3,9,21 or 45 second. No other times found.
> > This
> >> > is strange.
> >>
> >> Is this with or without syn-cookies / synflood protection?
>
> > Without syn-cookies.
>
> Strange. Without syn-cookies, I can easily get 3000 connections/second
> (full http requests for files of 1Kb in size) om my 100 Mbit network.
> [With syncookies/tcplogd the story is different]
This is the testing program which is in cause,
just look at the source and fear :)
--
-- Yoann, http://prelude.sourceforge.net
It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc().
The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST