Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

• Next message: Randy Dunlap: "[fyi] pre4-5 syntax errors"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture"
• In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
• Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Part of that is probably that sysctl (a) is very messy inside the kernel
> and (b) there is noone really maintaining the MIBs. Would it help if I
> volunteered to maintain the MIBs?

Currently the mibs I've seen are the sysctl numbers so we get them anyway
but they might as well be maintained and official.

The devices.txt stuff works fine so I definitely have no problem with you
being MIBmaster too

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Randy Dunlap: "[fyi] pre4-5 syntax errors"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture"
• In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
• Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST