Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually.

• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.3.99-pre4-4,dget fixed] "Unlink of SHM id 8356095 failed (-13).""
• In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Call Trace: [proc_pid_cmdline+55/60]
> > [proc_info_read+378/768] [sys_read+192/224] [system_call+52/56]
> > Apr 5 19:21:12 localhost kernel: Code: 39 43 1c 74 2a 50 8b 43 1c 50 68
> > 00 a8 1b c0 e8 37 89 ff ff
>
>
> Revert changes in kernel/exec.c - move task_lock() back to the place where
> it used to be.

If you do this please dont bother reporting further problems/hangs with the
procfs stuff, ps, top, etc. You just reintroduced a bug

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.3.99-pre4-4,dget fixed] "Unlink of SHM id 8356095 failed (-13).""
• In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST