Re: eepro100...

From: Martin Mares (mj@suse.cz)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2000 - 14:03:17 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Bill Wendling: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: eepro100..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> Since 2.2.x stuff like this have been handled in the generic PCI layer,
> not on a per-driver basis. (though 2.2.x doesn't cover nearly all the
> PCI-related stuff that 2.3.x does, especially WRT PM and hotplug)
>
> Would someone be up to submitting a patch to the kernel which notices
> and corrects for this behavior for the general case?

This is already handled in pci_set_power_state() in recent 2.3 kernels.
Actually, this function was inspired by Donald's pci-netif.

Have a nice fortnight

-- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> <mj@suse.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ "IBM = Idiots Buy Me"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Bill Wendling: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: eepro100..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST