Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 16:40:02 EST

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: An alternative way of populating /proc"
Previous message: sampsa@staff.netsonic.fi: "EXT2 problems with 2.3.99pre3 and 2.3.48"
In reply to: Matt Aubury: "An alternative way of populating /proc"
Next in thread: dean gaudet: "Re: An alternative way of populating /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:24:19PM +0100, Matt Aubury wrote:

> I've done a quick, dirty, unfinished implementation of this idea, so
> people can get the picture. Attached.

For those new to kernel development, like me, I compiled this with:

gcc -DMODULE -D_LOOSE_KERNEL_NAMES -D__KERNEL__ -c procbuild.c

And it works :-)

Regards,

bert hubert

-- | http://www.rent-a-nerd.nl | - U N I X - | Inspice et cautus eris - D11T'95

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: An alternative way of populating /proc"
Previous message: sampsa@staff.netsonic.fi: "EXT2 problems with 2.3.99pre3 and 2.3.48"
In reply to: Matt Aubury: "An alternative way of populating /proc"
Next in thread: dean gaudet: "Re: An alternative way of populating /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST