Peter Samuelson writes:
>
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> I will not get draw into another devfs flamewar.
> Sh*t.
Tell me about it. You know, whatever happened to accepting the
umpire's decision?
> Perhaps because adding a devfsd mechanism to devfs is more
> lightweight on the kernel side. fs/autofs/ is 68 blocks on my box,
> fs/devfs/ is just under twice that. I know obj side != source size,
> but I'd guess a lot less than half of devfs is devoted to the devfsd
> protocol....
Correct.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST