Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 12:48:10 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [Linux-Perf] [ANNOUNCE] Powertweak v0.1.13"
In reply to: Kurt Roeckx: "[BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Next in thread: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:37:17 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>

Is this a bug, or normal behaviour?

This is normal behavior.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [Linux-Perf] [ANNOUNCE] Powertweak v0.1.13"
In reply to: Kurt Roeckx: "[BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Next in thread: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: [BUG] socket buffer size different then set"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST