Re: Memory limitations in Linux.

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed May 03 2000 - 15:34:22 EST

Next message: Alexander Demenshin: "Re: [RFC] Should /proc/(foo) be /etc/dynamic/(foo) ?"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: serial port behaviour changed between 2.0 and 2.2"
In reply to: Mark Zealey: "Re: Memory limitations in Linux."
Next in thread: Ookhoi: "Re: Problem with compiling mm/vmscan.c in pre7-3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Can't you get 4TB on i386's? using page gran. That's what it says in 'the
> indespensable PC hardware book'.

Nope. The physical limit is 64Gb on the Xeons and 4Gb on a pure 32bit
box (i386/486/586). I guess the book has a typo 8).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Demenshin: "Re: [RFC] Should /proc/(foo) be /etc/dynamic/(foo) ?"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: serial port behaviour changed between 2.0 and 2.2"
In reply to: Mark Zealey: "Re: Memory limitations in Linux."
Next in thread: Ookhoi: "Re: Problem with compiling mm/vmscan.c in pre7-3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST