On Thu, 4 May 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > My box agrees with you that my attempt is wrong. Moving the task_lock()
> > back too it's original position (up one) works best here, but it looks
> > like it was moved intentionally so I keep trying to make it act right
> > where it is. (Even with it back in original position, my box isn't very
> > stable atm)
>
> Moving the task lock back solves some problems and adds others.
Good. That jibes with observations.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST