> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 09:17:55AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> >
> > What about LVM? And which would you think is a "cleaner" solution: MD
> > or LVM?
>
> LVM is probably more appropriate as a pseudo-partitioning tool, but
> I'm not sure if it has the same auto-start functionality that the
> raid code currently has. Heinz, can LVM configure itself by scanning
> partitions at kernel boot time without user-space intervention?
Not so far.
It is on the TODO though ;-{)
You have to run vgchange in userland to load the metadata into the driver.
>
> --Stephen
>
Heinz
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Systemmanagement TS T-Nova Entwicklungszentrum Darmstadt Heinz Mauelshagen Otto-Roehm-Strasse 71c Senior Systems Engineer Postfach 10 05 41 64205 Darmstadt mge@EZ-Darmstadt.Telekom.de Germany +49 6151 886-425 FAX-386 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST