Re: proc corruption 2.2.16pre1

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 11:27:22 EST

Next message: Tim Coleman: "Re: Promise card no longer work as ide0/1?"
Previous message: Joerg Reuter: "Re: PATCH 2.3.99-7-3: "incompatible types in assignment" in scc.c and mkiss.c (more to go)"
In reply to: H . J . Lu: "Re: proc corruption 2.2.16pre1"
Next in thread: Rogier Wolff: "Re: proc corruption 2.2.16pre1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 5 May 2000, H . J . Lu wrote:

>BTW, you can return -ESPIPE on /proc to disallow lseek.

I think it's good idea.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Coleman: "Re: Promise card no longer work as ide0/1?"
Previous message: Joerg Reuter: "Re: PATCH 2.3.99-7-3: "incompatible types in assignment" in scc.c and mkiss.c (more to go)"
In reply to: H . J . Lu: "Re: proc corruption 2.2.16pre1"
Next in thread: Rogier Wolff: "Re: proc corruption 2.2.16pre1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST