On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:24:29PM +0200, Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> The 10 is because the %digit syntax has never been extended to %digits.
> There was a discussion on the egcs list many months ago about extending
> this, perhaps to include names operands such as %{src}. But it didn't
> get very far.
According to some older discussion, the plan is to deprecate %[0-9][0-9]
because that'S ambigious at the moment, and support %digits in a later
version of gcc.
(The reason this oh-so-ugly limitation exists is that it is not a limit
you normally hit in real-world-applications, and the linux-kernel drives
development in that part of the compiler quite a bit ;)
-- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST